Chuck Wendig: Terribleminds

Apple-Obsessed Author Fella

Writers Who Use AI Are Not Real Writers

Dorothy Parker famously (but probably not really) said, “I hate to write, but I love having written,” which is a sentiment I don’t largely understand or agree with in the broader sense, but certainly have experienced during a kick-to-the-nuts writing day where the words arrive with the effort of trying to do proctology on a stampeding horse while both you and the horse are blindfolded. But as it turns out, there’s a sort of third level to this notion, one altogether more troubling and ultimately even less understandable: “I hate to write, I hate to have written, I mostly just want to be published.” Or, “I really just want to have money.” Or, “I actually want to just use as few keystrokes as possible to make my computer barf up stolen artistic authorial valor onto the internet in the hopes of charging absolute rubes a couple bucks for the narrative puke I hastily urged into a book-shaped pile.”

What I’m trying to say is, I read that NYT article about author — sorry, “author,” with airquotes as pissily vigorous as you can make them — Coral Hart, a self-proclaimed ugggh “AI evangelist” who over the last year has made AI churn out over 200 novels across nearly two dozen pen-names.*

Reading that makes me feel so angry and so sad at the same time — some combination of fury and weary sorrow for which the Germans must have a word. It’s hard to even articulate my objection, I’m so grossed-out by that — I wasn’t even sure I could mount a cogent response to any of this that didn’t end up as just angry mouth noises and erratic gesticulations. (Which is better, one supposes, than geriatic ejaculations.) Mostly I just want to post a series of photos depicting the faces I’m making, which likely run the gamut of “trying to hold back my rising gorge” and “watching a lion eat a human baby” and “kill me kill me now all of time and all of technology and this is where we ended up oh god just go back in time and end it all before it ever began.”

So, instead, I thought I’d tackle one particular thing Coral Hart (which is itself a pseudonym, since retired) said, and it’s this:

“If I can generate a book in a day, and you need six months to write a book, who’s going to win the race?” she said.

Ahhhhh. What the fuck. Ahhhhhh. AHHHH. That’s not — that’s not how any of this works, Coral! But this smug “winner” attitude is the absolutely natural apotheosis of the Internet’s obsession with churning out content. Generic, shapeless, formless content — a slurry machine where you turn the pipe on and lorum ipsum diarrhea comes shooting out at maximum pressure. It is the natural outcome of a race-to-the-bottom low-price churn-and-burn self-publishing environment, to boot — it’s less move fast and break things and more move fast and make broken things, because who cares, dipshits will pay for it.

This is the equivalent of, “Well, if I can blow up a cow with dynamite in ten minutes, but you need three hours to butcher it, who’s going to win the race?”

But of course, in the quote — a quote which is itself a cocky, smug assertion of superiority based purely on speed — is buried a greater, uglier truth.

If I can generate a book in a day–

and you need six months to write a book–

She’s not writing anything.

And she knows that.

She’s “generating” it.

Intrinsic to this is, “ha ha, you dumbass, over there still writing books like an asshole, whereas me, I just use a computer to do it for me.”

Except, intrinsic to that is the reality that the computer didn’t make that stuff up either. You know who did? We did. Actual authors. Real writers! We wrote the stuff, the fascist techbro fuckwads stole what we wrote, and then ticks and leeches like Coral Fucking Hart are happy to drink the blood those monsters have already stolen from us. She is churning out 200 books a year not out of the ether, but by drilling into the ground and drawing up the juice of an infinity of other books**, all stolen, all turned to narrative petroleum to fuel her fantasy of being a real writer.

And that is a fantasy.

Because Coral Hart is not a real writer.

Coral Hart is an opportunistic vampire — a thief, a grifter, a lazy pick-me.

She’s not even a master vampire. No, the master vampires are the ones who built this plagiarism machine. She’s just a ghoulish neonate, a feral bloodsucker down in the sewers happy to feed on the blood-soaked fatberg formed in the tunnels by the elder lords.

She’s a “writer” the same way I’m a “chef” when I pull a frozen dinner out of the fucking microwave. Someone else did all the work and packaged it together. I just hit the buttons and set the time.

So, to remind you:

Writers who use AI —

Are not real writers.

And this comes after years, years where Authorial Discourse has worked very hard to build all these fences in order to define who gets to be a Real Writer — and up until this point, all those fences have been false, bullshit borders. They’re illusions. I’ve long said that the test is so, so simple: real writers write. That’s it. That’s what it takes to be a writer.

Writers write.

And writers who use AI?

They’re not writing, are they?

They’re churning. They’re clicking buttons. They’re stealing. They’re plagiarizing.

But they’re not writing.

And they don’t even want to be writers. Because if they wanted to be writers, guess what? They’d fucking write! They’d want to write! Because writing, even on the worst day, the hardest day, is glorious. Even when the words suck and you break your teeth from grinding them so hard, it’s still a powerful, formative experience where you take all that you know and have been and have dreamed and are afraid of — you take all of that and you turn it into something else. You crystallize it. You coalesce it. You turn all this stuff that exists invisibly in your mind and make it visible on the page, inventing new people and new worlds and strange situations and you reach for revelations about love and hate and jealousy and all the ideas both big and small. You take nothing and you make something.

So powerful.

But AI acolytes don’t do any of that.

They wait for you to do it, sure.

Then they stick their greedy teeth in and tear off a piece.

The saying goes, why would I want to read something you didn’t even bother to write, but then we must also ask, why do THEY want to do it? Why does someone want to publish something they didn’t write, didn’t conceive of, didn’t edit, didn’t gestate, didn’t birth forth across amazing and frustrating writing sessions? Because it’s all just a get-rich-quick scheme. That’s it, revealed. Coral Hart gave up the game. She doesn’t want to write.

She just wants to generate, just wants to get paid, get that money, so fuck writers, fuck readers, fuck you.

Real writers don’t use AI.

That’s the red line.


* It’s unclear if she even makes much money at it, but she does make money teaching you how to make money at it, which is a profound irony and ultimately ends up being one of those get-rich-quick schemes where you see an ad in the paper telling you how to make all this money stuffing envelopes but what you’re stuffing the envelopes with is the exact same information you got about making money stuffing envelopes, which is to say you’re charging people money to tell them secretly that you’re scamming them and now they can scam other people too, an endless human centipede of shit being passed down the line, ass to mouth, mouth to ass.

** Note too the absolute gall she has to act cocky as fuck about this when she’s using Anthropic’s Claude, which was verifiably built on stolen books, including mine, and has been proven through a class-action suit!


Anyway!

Buy my books! A human wrote them! (Ahem: me.) Humans edited them. Humans designed them inside and out. Humans helped sell and market them, both at a publisher and at a bookstore. You could even gasp order my newest, my demonic novel, The Calamities, coming out in August. I’ll even, as a human, sign it and personalize it and tell you who your DEMONIC PROGENITOR secretly is. Do it. Preorder it. Make us humans happy, please and thank you.

Apple Review #41: Wild Twist

BEHOLD: A WILD (twist) APPLE APPEARS. But first: a brief digression about agricultural-industrial apple storage!

Did you know that the reason we get apples (and ostensibly a lot of other fruits and veggies) year-round, way outside their harvest period, is thanks to the magic of industrial agriculture? An apple gets picked and then is preserved in its current state through magic, which is to say the apple is fixed by the gaze of a merciless god, placed upon an accursed altar made of wyvern bones rimed with hoarfrost, and then insulted endlessly by a gamboling satyr-like figure known as the Apple Jimby, and it is these wicked insults and cursed configuration that keeps an apple fixed supernaturally in the state where it can still be eaten fresh months later.

*receives a note*

Okay never mind, it’s apparently something called “science” where they put the apples in “controlled atmosphere” (CA) storage rooms, where the apples are “put to sleep” by “gases” and “temperature.” Whatever. I was told it was the god and the Apple Jimby wyvern insult thing.

You can read about apple storage here. It’s actually fairly neat — and also interesting that each apple can’t just be stored the same way as the apple next door to it. They are each precious apple snowflakes and must be tamed and pleased according to their capricious apple whims.

I’m also to understand that the way apples truly lose their character is not in this storage but rather, once they’re out of it — taken out of controlled storage, loaded onto trucks or trains or, I like to assume, an army of Big Ag Hovercrafts, left in grocery store bins for far too long. And that’s where apples get old and weird and lose the thing that makes them what they are, and it’s why you end up with mushy, meh, mediocre lumps — the ghost of good fruit rather than good fruit itself.

All right. Onto the review.

My review of a Wild Twist apple, from Giant grocery, late-Jan:

Two “wild twists” regarding this apple come to mind —

First, that it was once known as the Sweet Cheeks apple, which is a puzzling and vaguely-porny name, and I’m fascinated by how anyone thought that was a good name for an apple, because it’s a terrible name for an apple, yet also somehow an amazing name for an apple. Especially if you were intending to cat-call the apple on the streets of Appletown, like a weird apple creeper.

Second, that for an apple once named SWEET CHEEKS and now named WILD TWIST, the apple is alarmingly mid.

It’s crunchy, not crisp. It’s moderately juicy. It’s incredibly sweet, with minimal tartness detected. The cheeks, they are sweet, and nothing else beyond that. Its taste is, you know, apple. There’s zero complexity afoot. It’s just such a dullard’s apple. I don’t hate it! It’s fine! Totally fine! I’d eat one if you gave it to me but I’d never choose it directly.

I ate it and was left with almost no impression. Like I barely have any memory of eating the apple. I know I ate it. You can watch me eat it here. But it passed through me, like winter light through a clean window.

I’m to understand that this is a Honeycrisp x Pink Lady cross, and I like both of those apples, but smash them together and you get something less than the individual parts, I guess.

This is a straight-down-the-middle 4.5/10. My initial score was a truly-median 5/10, but I feel like, “I would eat this but never seek it” drops it below that. It’s whatever. It’s fine. Meh.

Wild Twist: The wild twist is *fart noise*

Reviews in 2025HoneycrispSweetieCrimson CrispKnobbed RussetCortlandMaiden’s BlushCox’s Orange PippinReine des ReinettesIngrid MarieHudson’s Golden GemHolsteinSuncrispAshmead’s KernelOpalescentOrleans ReinetteBlack GilliflowerRed Delicious Double FeatureJonathanRuby MacCrimson TopazEsopus SpitzenburgMutsuHunnyzWinesapStayman WinesapWinter BananaRibston PippinRhode Island GreeningRoxbury RussetOpalCosmic CrispBlack OxfordAnanas ReinetteSugarbeeGranny SmithLucyGlo/LucyRoseLudacrispD’arcy Spice, Lemonade

Iron Lung: What A Very Good, Very Weird Thing

Movies like this don’t generally get to exist.

Sorry — to rewind here a bit, I saw Iron Lung, the (very indie) Markiplier movie that adapts the David Szymanski game of the same name.

To rewind further, do you know who Markiplier is? If you have a teenager or are in any way interested in video games, you probably do — I guess you’d call him a YouTuber, which is accurate but also just feels too small. You could go with “content creator” but that also sucks, because content is just such a fucked-up AI barf word these days, as if anything created ever is just a starchy gruel lump you can shove into your brainmouth to give it something to chew on for a while. Mostly, I think of him as a very funny, very creative, and very popular dude-who-makes-videos. I don’t know that I’m a fan in the sense of weeping and shrieking and swooning dizzily as the Beatles come on stage, but my kiddo watches him, and so I started watching him, and he’s good stuff.

(He’s also a killer comedian, by the way — his Supermarket Simulator videos make me laugh heartily. I guffaw even! Guffaw.)

OKAY GOOD YES ANYWAY

He made a movie based on a video game.

And to go back to the fore of the post, it’s the kind of movie that doesn’t really get to exist any more, and I hope — nay, I pray to whatever heretic gods I can find in the gurgling crimson mess of the blood sea — that more get to happen.

Here’s why.

This is a flawed, fucked-up little sci-fi-horror movie about a convict welded into a primitive submarine, flung into an ocean of literal blood on some distant moon, and then asked to search blindly in the crimson deep for Something Mysterious while also being hunted by Something Mysterious. There’s patchy backstory and staticky communication and — I dunno what the fuck is going on. Ghosts? Some kind of apocalypse? A plague? A blood god? Again: I really don’t know. I could not tell you what the fuck I just watched. And I really like that I could not tell you what the fuck I just watched. It brings this fascinating vibe of something… Lynchian, paired with the claustrophic (and bloody) early work of Sam Raimi. A little bit Eraserhead, a little bit Evil Dead. A soupçon of Event Horizon, too.

(This is actually somewhat ironic then that Iron Lung was up against a Sam Raimi movie at the box office, duking it out.)

(And Iron Lung won that battle on Friday, and almost won the weekend.)

(And Iron Lung kicked the everloving shit out of Melania, thus proving that, in fact, there may be a god. Or gods. Or a sentient blood ocean. I dunno.)

Anyway. Here’s the thing — I just feel like, for the most part, movies and even television shows have to kind of be One Specific Thing now. Everything genre is Marvel Star Wars Stranger Things, and non-genre is probably something a little more high-minded than that, and it’s not that I hate any of these things. I don’t. I’m a basic bish a lot of times. I am not a fancy man. But while I may like and appreciate these things, I also really, really like weird-ass shit, shit that doesn’t belong, shit that doesn’t make sense, just some real head-fuckery, and I think this film is exactly that, and I am glad it exists.

Again, is it flawed? Sure. It’s pace is off. It runs too long. Sometimes it vibes a bit much like “a guy who plays video games for a living is now starring as a guy inside a video game.” But then it reaches for these big weird gross moments, and it gets them. Markiplier has real directing chops in this — some stunning visuals and truly twitchy moments are present.

And in a world where we learn again and again that streamers want shows and movies where the plot is explained three or four times throughout to keep people who are looking at their phones from clicking elsewhere —

Well, it’s mighty fucking refreshing to get a movie that does not give one hot little rabbit shit about that. You’re just like the convict in the movie — welded into a box for two hours, given little clue or context, good luck, it’s gonna get weird down there in the blood-dark tides.

So, I dunno — see it. It’s weird. It’s neat. I’m gonna find and play the game. I hope more movies like this get to exist. I hope more Markiplier movies get to exist. This feels truly independent — and, when you learn how he made the damn thing, and how his community supported him, you’ll see just how independent this was.

MORE WEIRD-ASS INDIE MOVIES, please and thank you.

In fact, if someone could please let Markiplier make an Inscryption movie, that’d be lovely. *pushes money into defunct CD-ROM drive I have nearby*

(Oh and speaking of weird little indie horror movies, if you haven’t seen I SAW THE TV GLOW, that’s another. So. Yeah. Go see it.)

OKAY BYE

Cover Reveal: The Calamities

And, we have a cover for The Calamities, courtesy of Del Rey and the Boland Design Co (who also did the stellar Staircase in the Woods cover)!


The description:

The heir to one of the world’s most influential families reckons with the demonic secret to their power, in this contemporary dark fantasy that melds occult magic with shocking family drama from the New York Times bestselling author of The Book of Accidents.

Mourning Mayne knows he’ll one day bear the duty of managing his family’s vast empire of wealth and power. But the feckless Mourning has always struggled to accept this legacy, which is one of cruelty, domination, and exploitation… and something even darker.

Because the Maynes are no ordinary family: Hidden in our world are the fiends—half-human, half-demon, and possessed of dark magic born from buying human souls—and the Maynes are one of the oldest and most influential fiendish families.

But when Mourning’s estranged father, the formidable and terrifying Hadrian Mayne, demands that he return to the fold, Mourning has to make a decision whether to accept his legacy and embrace his role in the family, or to forge his own destiny, and with it, change the course of the world.

Because along the way home, he will meet Key, a black-market seller of human souls, and Quinn, an artist who may hold the dark truth behind the fate of the fiends. Alone, they have all struggled with the darkness of their fiendish nature…but together, they might find a path out of the shadows.


And, of course, the pre-order links:

First, you can get a copy signed and personalized and sent directly to you, courtesy of my local store, Doylestown Bookshop — and the same is true of the upcoming Staircase in the Woods paperback, too.

Or, you can procure from:

Bookshop.org | Your local indie store, wherever that may be | Libro.fm | B&N | Amz | BAM | Apple | Kobo | And I’ll add more links as we get closer…

Oh, and the book releases on August 18th.


I won’t get too deep into talking about the book now — it’s occulty and demony and creepy and weird and I had a lot of fun writing it. I’m doing line-edits now and just re-reading it reminds me what a blast I had with it. Agares House and the Dantalion and founts of elixir! Stolen souls and twisted love and bad fathers! There’s also a certain orange cat in it. And a certain demon. But you’ll see that when you get the book.

Also will surely have more things to announce in the coming days — and I suspect I’ll be on tour with it, as well!

Oh, and of course, this is only the first book.

The second book, Chaos Reigns, will be out (I believe) the following year.

In the meantime —

Don’t go selling your soul to any demons, yeah?

The Rage and the Hope

I’m a writer and I should be eloquent. I should have eloquence, ready at hand, for things like this. I should have poetry paired with clarity and I should find a way to turn what I’m feeling into something, into anything beyond what it already is, like taking ingredients and making them into a plate of food, but all I have are these raw ingredients of rage and confusion and uncertainty. And I know it’s the same ingredients you all have, and I know we’re all just staring at them in front of us like we want to turn them into something, but we don’t know what and we don’t know how. I have names like Keith Porter and Renee Good and Alex Pretti and in some cases I’ve seen how they die, burned into my brain, more raw ingredients I can’t quite process, for which I can’t find eloquence. And I keep thinking I should find that eloquence here but I guess I’m well-past that point and I’m saying it anyway, that we are under the heel of a fascist federal government. I’m saying fuck ICE, abolish ICE, prosecute ICE, and I’m saying that these things are the moderate position, this is the centrist, milquetoast view at this point, and they should be thankful it is, because the longer people go under the boot, the longer they go without justice, the more the moderate position drifts to the immoderate, to the extreme, to people finding a way to get justice in ways that won’t be granted to them by the government above them. Justice taken if not given. Justice born of rage. Rage, rage, what we have is rage, fuck ICE, fuck Trump, fuck it all — but another ingredient is there, too, one I didn’t expect, one whose flavor is strange but perfect and necessary: there’s the reagent of hope, too, because we see people, people just regular people out there in Minnesota, and Chicago before that, and Los Angeles and Portland before that, finding their voices, their connections, their communities, their hearts, and standing tall before the small men in their masks and their fucking Nazi coats, and they stand and they film and they blow the whistles and they harangue and cast the necessary invective like magic fucking spells, and they do this even through clouds of chemical poison, they do this against advancing armed vehicles, they do this even when others amongst them are shot. The fear hasn’t taken them. That’s an ingredient not present: the fear. They have rage, but they have hope. They show rage. They give hope. They stand tall and give us all that hope, communicative, collective, contagious hope. Our government, our politicians, better smell what’s on the wind, better taste that blood in the water, better see the rage and those on our side better match that rage, and those against us must wither against it. Fuck ICE. Abolish ICE. Persecute ICE. And those who cannot agree on these plain and obvious things need to get out of the way and let the people work. I Stand With Minnesota dot com. Give money. Call your reps. Show up. Find the rage. But fuel it with hope. Love to you all, except the Nazi fuckers who are keeping this nightmare going.

Apple Review #40: Lemonade Apple

It is the new year, and the apple reviews persist. What, did you think they would stop? THE APPLE REVIEWS CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES.

Anyway, today, my mind is a bit on branding.

I am on the record, I think, as stating that branding for writers is ultimately a bad thing — there is certainly some industry value to it, but I also like to note that a brand is a thing you burn into a sheep’s ass to ensure everyone knows who owns it. Branding sort of keeps you locked into a specific mode and it’s hard to escape the gravity of that. But really, today, I’m thinking about how food is branded. In particular, agriculture like apples.

I think one of the nice things about heritage (aka heirloom aka antique aka old-timey aka ancient occult pomological intrusions upon reality) apples is that they really don’t suffer from the plague of branding — I mean, okay, they do, a little bit. And it’s not like they were entirely free from the clutches of capitalism: apples have long been desirable and part of the resources bought and sold and traded between regions and nations. But still, it’s nice that a lot of the old apples are named without sales magic in mind. “I call this apple GRUNCH because I discovered it and my name is EDWARD GRUNCH.” “This apple is called RUSSETED FUCKLUMP because it is russeted and looks like a nasty fucklump.” There is a purity to this, a simplicity — this is the apple, this its name, we are unconcerned with whether or not you are enticed by its title, by its branding. But now —

Well, now you get PIZAZZ and JAZZ and HONEYCRISP and EVERCRISP and SEXYCRISP and JUICYLUST or whatever the fuck they’re calling apples now.

(This is a small part of my “evil apple” book, Black River Orchard — the family whose orchard grows the aforementioned apple goes through a conversation of what to name it. The father wants to name it after himself, and the daughter — a wannabe influencer — believes it needs to be called something sexier to get people’s attention. So: Ruby Slipper is what they settle on. And if I’m being honest, I think that’s a banger name for a lush, red apple.)

This is, of course, the nature of capitalism — in a perfect execution, capitalism is a secondary mechanism, and one well-regulated, but we are about as far from a perfect execution as we can be, and so capitalism is mostly just a giant machine trying to distract you while it keeps going for your wallet. The sales and branding part of the machine doesn’t even really need to be all that honest anymore — it can just say a thing and give you a logo or an advertisement and coast pretty entirely on vibes, and a lot of products do exactly that. I suppose to their credit, some apples are still aptly named: Honeycrisp is crisp, and tastes a little like honey. But others are like, sure, okay. Jazz doesn’t play jazz music. It is not evocative of jazz. It’s just a jazzy name for an otherwise whatever apple.

Anyway, all this brings me to:

My review of a Lemonade apple, from the grocery store, mid-Dec:

I think it stands to figure that if we are to assume the branding here is true and evocative of the apple-eating experience born of this particular apple, we should then expect that the apple in question tastes like lemonade.

Spoiler alert: this apple does not taste like lemonade.

So, I ate two of these, to note, both from the same day, same store.

The first, you can watch me eat here if that tickles your bits.

That apple was — nnyeaaaah meh? Ennnh? Nnnnmmuhhh? The skin was pleasing. The apple was soft, just on the edge of mealy. The flavor was a ghost of flavor: present, barely accounted for, and what flavor was there was kind of this blunt, watery sweet-tart thing. Lemonade was not in the flavor profile. Nothing was in the flavor profile. Nothing but woe.

Actually, scratch that, woe probably tastes like something.

Then last night I made this ricotta apple cake someone sent me on Bluesky (whoever that was, thanks, it made something more akin to cornbread and less akin to cake, but I like it), and one of the apples I used was the other Lemonade apple, so I took a slice of that and ate it and —

Okay, not an entirely different apple, but definitely an apple in a better place, mentally and emotionally. This apple had not yet been traumatized by time, or perhaps, simply had a good therapist, because this second apple was crunchier — still on the softer side, but on the pleasing side of that fence. Didn’t melt in your mouth or turn to sand, but also didn’t remain asserting itself between your chompers for ten minutes. The apple was also a bit more flavorful — still not like WOW OOH ZING, but it had a taste like a lesser Cox’s Orange Pippin, or a Golden Delicious. Still not a thrilling apple. Still not lemonadey, at all. Not particularly juicy. But enjoyable for what it was.

That second apple punched up the tartness and sweetness a bit. Was sunnier. The citrus was more orange than lemon.

Still not great, but didn’t hate it at all.

As such, I’ll judge the apple based on the better of the two, but know that the first one would’ve gotten a 3/10 easy. Second one, let’s call it a 5/10.

Lemonade apple: more like le-MEH-nade am I right

Reviews in 2025HoneycrispSweetieCrimson CrispKnobbed RussetCortlandMaiden’s BlushCox’s Orange PippinReine des ReinettesIngrid MarieHudson’s Golden GemHolsteinSuncrispAshmead’s KernelOpalescentOrleans ReinetteBlack GilliflowerRed Delicious Double FeatureJonathanRuby MacCrimson TopazEsopus SpitzenburgMutsuHunnyzWinesapStayman WinesapWinter BananaRibston PippinRhode Island GreeningRoxbury RussetOpalCosmic CrispBlack OxfordAnanas ReinetteSugarbeeGranny SmithLucyGlo/LucyRoseLudacrisp, D’arcy Spice